This is better, sort of :)
At least it tells a happy story, and makes me smile so much! :D
On the other hand they STILL GET THE PRONOUNS WRONG! They stopped editting what the parents say to force in male pronouns but they KEEP using male pronouns even after acknowledging a) the parents refer to their DAUGHTER with FEMALE pronouns b) their DAUGHTER has changed her name and identifies as a girl.
Which IS WHAT I HATE! Ppl who aren't versed in trans issues who read these articles will get the impression that well yus, ppl may CALL the transperson one thing, but rly we should refer to them with birth sex pronouns and with the birth sex name. It infers that this is all in our heads, that to it's NOT our identity, it's kinda just like we're crazy and wanna be called "Sir Stanfield of Nottingshire" or something and our friends and family humour us.
ARGH
If her name is VIOLET SAY VIOLET! You can include a note saying "Violet was born male with a male name, but identifies as female, and therefore we will be referring to her with female pronouns and by her chosen name" if you're so worried about readers being confused.
I mean what's so bad about that? Then there's no confusion! >:O
The parents are great tho and delaying her puberty :) I hope she starts HRT and stuff and gets the life she wants :D Also sticking with her for school and everything!
Yay! :]
Still mad at the paper tho.
kids who are more than effeminate boys or masculine girls who may turn out to be gay in adulthood.
Let's stop linking gender and sexual preference k? >.> There are plenty of "effeminate" straight boys and "masculine" straight girls too. >:O And if you're gonna stick the "may" in there, you might as well just not include it and then it'd look A LOT better.
Also that they decide to give the nutjobs a say again...
Polly Carmichael, a British psychologist who works at the Portman Clinic in London, which has a unit specifically dedicated to gender identity, says the identity of most children this age is in constant flux.
"You can have a child who is presenting with absolute certainty, but it may be that at a later point they will decide that is not in fact what they want and their feelings may indeed change," Carmichael says.
The Portman clinic has treated 124 kids since 1989. It requires children to live as the gender they were born with. And 80 percent of its patients — once grown — chose as adults to keep their biological gender.
Ok, I was 7 in 1989, I didn't come out to MYSELF until I was almost 24. *I* would have been one of the 80% as far as she knows, and I didn't even have to go thru this bs treatment of being FORCED to live as the gender I was born with (and prolly pushed in many other Zuckeresque ways to train me and condition me to stay male using guilt and fear and other beatsticks)! >:O
So I call complete and utter BS on that stat. Even WITHOUT "treatment", ppl force themselves to repress and hide themselves and who they are well into their 20s and 30s. :\ Prolly all of the children she's treated are at most in their mid 20s right now. That stat means NOTHING >:O As I said, it could have even been applied to me a couple years ago >:o
The opposite outcome was seen by the researchers in the Netherlands who first developed the hormone-blocking treatment. They have treated 100 patients and all chose — as adults — to live as the opposite sex.
This seems a little more right to me since it gave the kids a CHOICE and wasn't trying to coerce the children to choose a certain gender. :) Maybe the children will choose to de transition later but at least they chose the course of their lives rather than were coerced and forced into it, by treatment, by the stigma of society, by their own shame and fears :(
So the verdict is still out about how many kids with gender identity disorder will choose sexual reassignment as adults — that is, to live as a member of the opposite sex by changing physical appearance or by having a sex change operation.
Um, thx NPR. Let's invite the flat-earth ppl to the debate too and say the "verdict is still out" on a round Earth. >:|
I hate how they feel that to be "fair" and "unbiased" they have to let the "we can fix trannies cuz they're broken" crowd into an article that's ABOUT TRANSCHILDREN and their experiences! >:O If we have an article about vegetarianism, do we have to let the anti-veggies (hehehe XD) have a bit too? Or if we talk about the gay pride parade, should we be also giving space to the ex-gay/anti-gay crowd and saying "the verdict is still out".
It may be progress (over articles purely talking about how sick transppl are), but it's STILL stupid >:O
Also can we plz get some coverage of FtMs too? Why is it always the MtFs? Is it cuz the "boys in dresses" thing is so much harder for society to swallow and makes a better "OMG LOOK" story than "girls in pants"? >:O
And you dun NEED to have surgery. You should only choose surgery if you WANT it, not b/c ppl say you NEED it to live as your chosen gender. You dun! >:| And that's part of the hilarity of the gender essentialists like Zucker and stuff... they want to "cure" you but if you DO go with it, they insist you HAVE to get surgery or they wun help you. >:O
This makes deciding on treatment very difficult, because there is one very serious side effect to the second part of the treatment.
Taking testosterone or estrogen immediately after blocking puberty will make a teenage patient sterile.
Speaking only for myself. I'd rather live as an infertile woman than a fertile man. :] I can adopt.
I know for many ppl tho it is very important for them and some have their eggs or sperm frozen so they can have children of their own later. Some can't afford to tho. :( But ultimately it is still THEIR decision on what to do with their lives and their body.
Spack, however, is quick to point out that there is no risk of infertility from the hormone-blocking treatment alone. Infertility only comes when the hormone-blocking treatment is paired with Stage 2, the use of opposite-sex hormones. And so, Spack says, hormone blockers should really be seen simply as a treatment that gives families more time to think about what to do.
"It's a lot different to be talking to a 14-, 15-, 16-year-old about the implications of this than a 10- to 12-year-old," he says. "And so it buys you time ... without the tremendous fear of their body getting out of control."
*nodnods* So again they have choice :) They get to decide what they want, and to think about this.
Yus, ppl will argue "but they might regret it!" They might regret NOT transitioning too. The damage from puberty and stuff is hard to reverse. And to me, no cisperson has the right to tell us that these children dunno what they're getting into. THEY have NO idea what it's like to fear puberty b/c it means the development of the wrong secondary sex characteristics, to have your body change into the gender you're not, irreversably in many ways. To be a girl and grow facial and body hair and an adam's apple and have your voice deepen. To be a guy and grow breasts? >:O And to have to live with these changes?
These are not SMALL things! >:O I've spend hundreds on laser hair removal and I'm lucky. I had the money and I didn't have that much hair compared to some ppl. I'm still spending money on electrolysis to finish it off. Many other transwomen spend thousands on hair removal over YEARS.
We won't get into my voice. :(
So I have no patience for any cisperson who tells transchildren that they dunno what they're choosing.
They DO know. They know FULL well, and it's their body and THEIR CHOICE TO MAKE. >:O
In terms of how Violet thinks about hormone blockers, her older sister, Melina, says that the problem of puberty is very much on her mind. "She's getting hair in some places and stuff and ... every day she says that she feels a little bit more manly. Which is really hard for her."
Melina, who is 14, says she sometimes thinks about what it would be like if she woke up every day to a body that was slowing turning male. If she were growing in ways that felt alien and frightening.
:) I rly like this part b/c Melina is awesome (and hay they used Violet's proper name!) and she's very right. :(
Even now I worry about being manly. My hairline was receding before I got hormones. Thankfully it's grown back.. but do you know how that felt!? And then my t-blockers stopped for a bit, I started growing some of my facial hair I zapped away back... and just... IT FREAKED ME OUT.
Even just knowing the t-blockers fail, every day was another day with the wrong hormones flowing thru my body! And it hurt me SO much just to think and worry about it! :(
And every transperson's experiences are different. Some ppl are very dysphoric, other ppl not so, some ppl only want low dose hormones, or did not hate puberty, for others it feels like a death sentence. The point tho is that it's OUR body and OUR identity and OUR feelings OUR choice and nobody elses! >:O
"To go through the process of the gender that you're really not ... that must be the most scariest most disgusting thing ... I can't even imagine what that's like," she says.
*double nods*
It is.. horrifying :( To have your body change in ways that are anathema to you... and to be aware of it and have a choice at that age, before it begins... I didn't think I had a choice... if I did, it would be even SCARIER to be faced with it. :( So to those idiot cisdoctors, plz dun think we dunno what we're dealing with. We do. It's you who don't. You don't know how we feel. And you have no right to tell us what to do with our bodies and our lives, b/c ultimately we're the ones who are going to have live it! >:O
I am so glad that there are these wonderful doctors out there that do give children the choice, that treatment exists to delay puberty so they CAN make that choice. :)
I'm so happy that Violet gets to choose tho (and she has SUCH a wonderful and supportive family :) )! :] And I hope one day SOON, all transgendered children will get the same choice. :)
